UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARL WESCOTT, Case No. 22-cv-00070-JCS
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
KEN MATUSOW, et al., COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED
Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. No. 1,
I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Carl Wescott, pro se, applies to proceed in forma pauperis. See dkt. 3. Sufficient cause having been shown, that application is GRANTED. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Wescott’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Wescott brings claims under California law for breach of contract and promissory fraud against Defendants Ken Matusow and Synergicity, Inc. For the reasons discussed below, Wescott is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Wescott shall file either an amended complaint or a response to this order no later than May 11, 2022. If he does not do so, or fails to cure the deficiency…