Whitaker

Whitaker v. Chanel, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20225:21-cv-09330California4,529 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRIAN WHITAKER, Case No. 21-cv-09330-SVK

Plaintiff, ORDER ON (1) DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS; AND

v. (2) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

CHANEL, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 17 Defendant.

Plaintiff Brian Whitaker brings this lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, alleging that he encountered a non-accessible lounge table during a November 2021 visit to the Chanel store at 2855 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Santa Clara, California (the “Store”), which is owned by Defendant Chanel, Inc. Dkt. 1 (Complaint) ¶¶ 2, 3, 8. 10-16. Now before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt. 16. Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s administrative motion seeking an order requiring Defendant to provide dates for a joint site inspection. Dkt. 17. The Parties have consented to the jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.