Postpichal

Postpichal v. Cricket Wireless, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20223:19-cv-07270California734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMIE POSTPICHAL, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07270-WHA (AGT)

Plaintiffs,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 403 CRICKET WIRELESS, LLC, Defendant.

12 On December 23, 2021, Cricket produced a spreadsheet containing unredacted addresses and cellphone numbers for Cricket customers who plaintiffs contended were members of the certified class. The spreadsheet was designated confidential and is subject to the terms of the parties’ stipulated protective order (Dkt. 71). Cricket now says the customer addresses and cellphone numbers in the spreadsheet were “inadvertently produced” and must be destroyed because such information is “immune from disclosure under federal and state privacy laws.” Dkt. 403 at 4 (citing 47 U.S.C. § 222 and Cal. Pub. Util. Code § 2891(a)(4)). Cricket also claims that plaintiffs’ counsel—whom Judge Alsup has appointed to represent the certified class—have identified no legitimate need for the customer addresses and cellphone numbers at issue. The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.