Harris

Gregory v. Harris

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20225:21-cv-03311California1,598 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JEANE GREGORY, Case No. 21-cv-03311-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO DISMISS

JOEL A. HARRIS, Re: Dkt. No. 80 Defendant.

13 On January 6, 2022, this Court granted defendant Joel A. Harris’s motion to dismiss plaintiff Jeane Gregory’s complaint with limited leave to amend. Dkt. No. 78. Specifically, the Court gave Ms. Gregory leave to amend her claim for fraud, see Dkt. No. 78 at 5–6, 10, and her claim for breach of fiduciary duty or aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty, see id. at 7–8, 10. The Court directed Ms. Gregory to file an amended complaint by February 7, 2022. Id. at 10. On February 3, 2022, Ms. Gregory filed a document titled “Amendment - Motion for Summary Judgement.” Dkt. No. 79. On March 3, 2022, without leave of the Court, she filed another document titled “First Amended Complaint,” stating that her earlier filing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.