Navarro
Navarro v. SmileDirectClub, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARNOLD NAVARRO, Case No. 22-cv-00095-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. UNOPPOSED MOTION UNDER L.R. 7- 11 TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS, SMILEDIRECTCLUB, INC., et al., DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
REMAND, AND ORDERING
Defendants. DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE
SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE TO
SUPPORT THEIR MOTION TO
COMPEL
15 Arnold Navarro, the plaintiff in this putative class action, alleges that SmileDirectClub, 16 Inc., SmileDirectClub, LLC, Jeffrey Sulitzer, and Jeffrey Sulitzer, D.M.D., P.C. (collectively 17 “SDC”), engage in the unauthorized practice of dentistry in violation of California law. Both 18 parties have motions pending: Navarro seeks to amend the complaint and to remand this action 19 back to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Alameda for lack of 20 subject-matter jurisdiction, and SDC moves to compel arbitration. SDC contends that when 21 Navarro made an SDC…