McGann

McGann v. City of Sausalito

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20223:22-cv-02042California436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES MCGANN, Case No. 22-cv-02042-EMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

v. FORMA PAUPERIS; DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A

CITY OF SAUSALITO, et al., TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER; AND ORDER TO SHOW

Defendants. CAUSE

Docket Nos. 2-

13 14 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff James McGann’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). Based on the financial affidavit filed by Mr. McGann, the Court GRANTS the motion to proceed IFP. The Court also orders the U.S. Marshals’ Office to serve this order, the summons and complaint on Defendants because it appears Mr. McGann may have a viable claim for relief. He alleges, in effect, that he has been denied the ability to stay at the Marinship Park encampment and has nowhere else to go. See generally Martin v. City…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.