Weinstein

Weinstein v. Katapult Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20224:21-cv-05175California4,972 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREW WEINSTEIN, Case No. 21-cv-05175-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

KATAPULT GROUP, INC., MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 50

13 Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”). The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for April 14, 2022, was VACATED. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND This is a contract dispute. Plaintiff Andrew Weinstein, a resident of Ross, California, is a business executive and consultant “focused, among other things, on the convergence of financial technology (fintech), mobility, and the future of commerce.” FAC ¶ 1. Defendant Katapult…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.