Kang

Kang v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20225:17-cv-06220California5,889 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JAMES KANG and MICHAEL MOSES, individually and on behalf of all others Case No. 17-cv-06220-BLF similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, 10 v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

12 Defendant.

___________________________________ 14 PATRICIA BARRERAS and JACQUELINE Case No. 21-cv-00071-BLF F. IBARRA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART OBJECTOR KIRK FYSON’S MOTION FOR v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND SERVICE PAYMENT

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

[Re: ECF 149] Defendant.

21 The Court has granted final approval of a class action settlement in this suit against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) on behalf of its California-based home mortgage consultants (“HMCs”). See Final Approval Order, ECF 145. Plaintiffs claim that Wells…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.