Weinstein
Weinstein v. Katapult Group, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANDREW WEINSTEIN, Case No. 21-cv-05175-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER RE: DISCOVERY
KATAPULT GROUP, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 54 Defendant.
13 Before the court is a discovery letter brief detailing the parties’ contentions regarding certain of plaintiff’s requests for production (“RFPs”). The letter brief focuses on five categories of plaintiff’s RFPs for which defendant has not produced all materials to plaintiff’s satisfaction: 1. RFP No. 9: Documents relating to defendant’s ability to raise capital and financing; 2. RFP Nos. 12 and 21: Defendant’s capitalization tables; and RFP No. 13: Documents relating to the value of options; 3. RFP No. 15: Documents relating to board minutes, votes, or resolutions that refer or relate to options; 4. RFP Nos. 19 and 20: Documents relating to the provision of defendant’s stock option plan(s) and/or and form stock option agreement(s)…