Scott

Scott v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20225:21-cv-06418California2,564 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KAREN R. SCOTT, Case No. 21-cv-06418-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION TO REMAND

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants.

Plaintiff Karen R. Scott initiated this suit in state court against Defendants Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) and Susanville Ford (“SF”), asserting claims for breach of implied and express warranties under California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. After SF was dismissed in the state court case, Ford removed this action to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446, asserting diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Notice of Removal (“Notice”) 1, Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff now moves to remand asserting that removal for diversity was improper because Ford has not met its burden of showing that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Motion to Remand, Dkt. No. 18. Ford opposes the motion, asserting that Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.