Borges
Borges v. County of Mendocino
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ANN MARIE BORGES, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04537-SI
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, Re: Dkt. Nos. 97, 111 Defendant.
14 On April 8, 2022, the Court heard argument on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. The Court DENIES plaintiffs’ administrative motion to reopen the deposition of Diane Curry because the Court finds that plaintiffs have not demonstrated any basis for reopening that deposition. 19 BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Ann Marie Borges and Chris Gurr allege that the County of Mendocino violated their rights under the Equal Protection Clause of Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution when the County denied their application for a permit to cultivate medical cannabis on July 9, 2018, and when the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance…