Borges

Borges v. County of Mendocino

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20223:20-cv-04537California8,713 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ANN MARIE BORGES, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04537-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, Re: Dkt. Nos. 97, 111 Defendant.

14 On April 8, 2022, the Court heard argument on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. The Court DENIES plaintiffs’ administrative motion to reopen the deposition of Diane Curry because the Court finds that plaintiffs have not demonstrated any basis for reopening that deposition. 19 BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Ann Marie Borges and Chris Gurr allege that the County of Mendocino violated their rights under the Equal Protection Clause of Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution when the County denied their application for a permit to cultivate medical cannabis on July 9, 2018, and when the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.