Lenk

Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20225:20-cv-08094California294 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 KENNETH LAWRENCE LENK, Case No. 20-cv-08094-BLF Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO AMEND OR ALTER

V. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., PROCEDURE 59%e) Defendant. [Re: ECF 49] 11 The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Federal || Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (ECF 49), seeking relief from the Court’s order granting in part and || denying in part Defendant’s motion for prevailing party attorneys’ fees (ECF 47). The Court finds || the motion suitable for decision without soliciting a response from Defendant, and without oral a || argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Under Rule 59(e), a party may file a motion to alter or amend a judgment within 28 days || after the entry of the judgment. Some district courts within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.