Jones

Jones v. Regents of the University of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20224:21-cv-07844California4,066 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NADEZHDA JONES, Case No. 21-cv-07844-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS AND RESOLVING

OUTSTANDING MOTIONS

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 31, 46, 51, 63, 74, 75 11 Defendants.

12 Now before the Court for consideration are the motions to dismiss filed by defendants the Regents of the University of California and Biana Roykh (“Regents”) and defendant California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) (collectively, “Defendants”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it finds the motion suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The Court GRANTS Defendants’ motions to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 31, 46); DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to certify for interlocutory appeal (Dkt. No. 51); and DENIES Plaintiff’s motions to stay as moot. (Dkt. Nos. 63, 74, 75.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.