Whitaker
Whitaker v. Huynh
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRIAN WHITAKER, Case No. 21-cv-08021-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENANT’S
v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
GIAU M. HUYNH, Re: Dkt. No. 19, 22 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19) and Administrative Motion for Relief from General Order No. 56 Requirements (ECF No. 22). On March 31, 2022, Plaintiff filed an Opposition to Defendant’s Administrative Motion. ECF No. 23. On April 5, 2022, Plaintiff filed an Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 24. On April 11, 2022, Defendant filed a Reply in support of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 25. The Court finds these matters suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the April 28, 2022 hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in…