Fortinet, Inc. v. Fortanix, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20223:20-cv-06900California7,621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FORTINET, INC., Case No. 20-cv-06900-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S FORTANIX, INC., MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; GRANTING IN PART

Defendant. AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE

13 Before the Court are three motions, each filed January 14, 2022: (1) defendant Fortanix, Inc.'s ("Fortanix") "Motion for Summary Judgement"; (2) plaintiff Fortinet, Inc.'s "Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Defendant's Laches Defense"; and (3) Fortanix's "Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert Testimony of Mr. David Hanson." The motions have been fully briefed. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, the Court rules as follows.1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.