Doe

Doe v. Google LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20223:20-cv-06822California1,661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN DOE, Case No. 20-cv-06822-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE ATTORNEY’S FEES AND

v. RECONSIDERATION REQUESTS

BORDERLAND BEAT, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 37, 38 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff John Doe, who was granted leave to proceed under a pseudonym, Dkt. No. 6, voluntarily dismissed all of the defendants in this action, including fictitious defendants Roes 1- 50. See Dkt. Nos. 10, 36, 43. The case was active for only 10 months between the filing of the complaint in September 2020 and the last round of dismissals in July 2021. Very little happened in the way of litigation during that time. The Court terminated the case in July 2021. While this would seem to have been the end of the matter, a defendant known as Roe 1 filed a motion for attorney’s fees, and a motion “for leave to file a formal motion to reconsider” the pseudonym order. Dkt. Nos. 37 (attorney’s fees), 38 (reconsideration). The parties’ familiarity with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.