In re HIV Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20223:19-cv-02573California5,664 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STALEY, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02573-EMC

REDACTED

Plaintiffs, FILED UNDER SEAL v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS OF

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., et al., PLAINTIFFS STALEY AND SNIPE Defendants. Docket No. 877 12 13 Currently pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by Gilead and Janssen (collectively, “Defendants”). Defendants argue that all claims asserted by two of the named end- payor plaintiffs (“EPPs”) –Peter Staley and Michael Snipe –should be dismissed because they lack standing to seek relief. Based on the motion for class certification, the EPPs do not seek to have either Mr. Staley or Mr. Snipe be a class representative any longer. However, the two still have individual claims. Defendants argue that the individual claims should be dismissed because Mr. Staley and Mr. Snipe have testified that did not purchase any of Defendants’ drugs during the relevant time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.