Sherman
Sherman v. The Regents of University of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 BENJAMIN SHERMAN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06441-VKD
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
THE REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF JUDGMENT
CALIFORNIA,
Re: Dkt. No. 35 Defendant.
13 Plaintiffs Benjamin Sherman and Zayd Hammoudeh assert claims against defendant The Regents of the University of California (“The Regents” or “the University”) for deliberate indifference to sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.; deliberate indifference to harassment based on race and/or national origin in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.; hostile work environment and discrimination based on race, religion, and/or national origin in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), California Government…