Sherman

Sherman v. The Regents of University of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20225:20-cv-06441California10,875 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 BENJAMIN SHERMAN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06441-VKD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

THE REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF JUDGMENT

CALIFORNIA,

Re: Dkt. No. 35 Defendant.

13 Plaintiffs Benjamin Sherman and Zayd Hammoudeh assert claims against defendant The Regents of the University of California (“The Regents” or “the University”) for deliberate indifference to sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.; deliberate indifference to harassment based on race and/or national origin in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.; hostile work environment and discrimination based on race, religion, and/or national origin in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), California Government…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.