Choudhuri

Choudhuri v. Specialised Loan Servicing

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20223:19-cv-04198California2,182 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KABITA CHOUDHURI, Case No. 3:19-cv-04198-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. AND STAY

SPECIALISED LOAN SERVICING, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 71, 80, 83 Defendants.

12 After several rounds of motions and orders, see Dkt. Nos. 6, 33, 65, one claim remains in this case: did defendants Specialized Loan Servicing (SLS) and Bosco Credit LLC (Bosco) fail to respond to “qualified written requests” (QWRs) from pro se plaintiff Kabita Choudhuri about a mortgage on her home, in violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq., (RESPA)? The answer is no, and defendants’ motions for summary judgment are granted. See Dkt. Nos. 80, 83. Choudhuri’s request to stay foreclosure, Dkt. No. 71, is denied. DISCUSSION I. LEGAL STANDARDS Parties “may move for summary judgment, identifying each claim or defense -- or the part of each claim or defense -- on which summary judgment is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.