PUTIAN AUTHENTIC ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT CO., LTD v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20225:22-cv-01901California5,569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PUTIAN AUTHENTIC ENTERPRISE Case No. 5:22-cv-01901-EJD MANAGEMENT CO., LTD, et al., ORDER DENYING RENEWED Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER v. 11 META PLATFORMS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 25 12 Defendant.

13 Plaintiffs Putian Authentic Enterprise Management Co., Ltd, Fuzhou Haina Hongyi Network Technology Co., Ltd, Fuzhou Baidai Network Technology Co., Ltd., Nanchang Huimeng Network Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou Chenghe Network Technology Co., Ltd. filed this action asserting the following claims against Defendants Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) and Does 1-10: (1) declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2201; (2) intentional interference with a contract; (3) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage; (4) promissory estoppel; (5) breach of contract; (6) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (7) unlawful and unfair…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.