Harris
Harris v. Ramirez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TEVIN LEE HARRIS,
Case No. 20-02523 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION AND v. SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER
B. RAMIREZ,
Defendant. 15 (Docket Nos. 6, 9)
17 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a correctional officer at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), where he is currently housed. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff has recently filed a motion for an “emergent request and urgent request for judicial and or request for injunction relief.” Dkt. No. 6. Plaintiff subsequently filed a “supplemented motion for injunction pursuant to Fed. R. C.P. 65(a).” Dkt. No. 9. The Court construes these papers as motions for a preliminary injunction under Rule 65(a) and/or temporary restraining order (“TRO”) under Rule 65(b). /// /// 27 DISCUSSION 2…