Hinds

Hinds v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20224:18-cv-01431California1,894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHELLE HINDS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-01431-JSW

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

STRIKE PAGA CLAIM ASSERTED

v. AGAINST DEFENDANT FEDEX

GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.

FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 180 11 Defendants.

12 On January 3, 2022, the Court reserved ruling on Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.’s (“FedEx”) motion to strike Plaintiffs’ claim under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). Dkt. No. 184, “January 3 Order”. The Court has recounted the facts underlying Plaintiffs’ dispute with FedEx in prior orders and will not repeat those facts here. In brief, FedEx has contracted with independent service providers (“ISPs”), one of which was defendant Bay Rim Services, Inc. (“Bay Rim”). Plaintiffs each worked as drivers for Bay Rim, and their theory of the case is that FedEx is liable as a joint employer for alleged labor code violations. Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.