Reilly

Reilly v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20223:21-cv-04601California5,051 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS M REILLY, Case No. 21-cv-04601-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

APPLE INC., Docket No. 45 Defendant.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Thomas M. Reilly is the developer of an app called Konverti which facilitates peer-to-peer, in-person currency exchanges. Docket No. 42 (“FAC”) ¶ 14. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint which alleged that Apple violated antitrust laws and California Business Code Section 17200 for removing Konverti from the Apple Store. Docket No. 41 (“Order”). After the dismissal, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”), which dropped the antitrust claims and alleged one violation of California Business Code Section 17200. In the FAC, Plaintiff alleges that Apple violated California Business Code Section 17200, also known as the “Unfair Competition Law” (“UCL”), by placing Konverti in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.