Adams

Adams v. Kerr

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20225:20-cv-08557California3,868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ADRIAN O. ADAMS, Case No. 20-cv-08557-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING SECOND

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART AND

DAREN KERR, et al., WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 23, 24, 25, 27]

12 This is a pro se civil rights action brought by Plaintiff Adrian O. Adams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various officials in the Santa Cruz district attorney’s office and sheriff’s department and court-appointed attorneys and individuals. ECF No. 18 (“SAC”). Adams’ complaint is hard to follow but appears to seek damages for alleged violations of his rights during state criminal prosecutions. Before the Court are four motions to dismiss brought by several different groups of defendants. ECF Nos. 23, 24, 25, 27. The Court finds the motions suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the June 30, 2022 hearing dates. Civ.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.