Whitaker

Whitaker v. Morsey

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20223:21-cv-03263California337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN WHITAKER,

Case No. 21-cv-03263-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

KALED MORSEY,

13 Defendant.

15 The complaint was filed on May 3, 2021. Under the initial scheduling order, Dkt. No. 5, the deadline to hold the joint site inspect of premises was on August 27, 2021, with the deadline for Plaintiff to file a Notice of Need for Mediation 42 days after that date. Plaintiff has failed to comply with this deadline or notify the Court of a settlement. Plaintiff shall show cause by May 10, 2022 why the matter should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. If there is no response to this order, the case will be dismissed without further notice. The Court also notes concerns about whether subject matter jurisdiction exists in this case. Federal courts “have an independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party.” Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.