Farrales

Farrales v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20224:21-cv-07624California6,515 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EDDY FARRALES, Case No. 21-cv-07624-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

REMAND AND GRANTING MOTION

v. FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 12, 21 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court is a motion to remand filed by Plaintiff Eddy Farrales and a motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. See Dkt. Nos. 12, 21. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion to remand and GRANTS the motion for judgment on the pleadings with leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action in San Francisco County Superior Court in September 2021. See Dkt. No. 1-3. Plaintiff alleges that he purchased a vehicle manufactured by Ford. See Dkt. No. 1- 4 (“FAC”) at ¶¶ 4–5. The vehicle was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.