Quackenbush

Quackenbush v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20223:20-cv-05599California4,778 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARY QUACKENBUSH, GHERI

SUELEN, ANNE PELLETTIERI,

No. C 20-05599 WHA MARISSA FEENEY, and CARYN

PRASSE, on behalf of themselves and all

others similarly situated,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR

RECONSIDERATION OF CLASS

13 v. CERTIFICATION

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR

COMPANY, INC., and

HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, LTD.

16 Defendants.

INTRODUCTION In this product-defect class action, plaintiffs and defendants independently move for reconsideration of an order on class certification. To the extent stated below, the motions for reconsideration are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. STATEMENT A previous order detailed the facts of this case (Dkt. No. 127). This action concerns vehicle owners who purchased certain Honda vehicles equipped with Variable Timing Control (VTC) actuator 14310-R44-A01 from authorized Honda dealers and now seek to recover for an alleged design…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.