Quackenbush
Quackenbush v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20223:20-cv-05599California4,778 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARY QUACKENBUSH, GHERI
SUELEN, ANNE PELLETTIERI,
No. C 20-05599 WHA MARISSA FEENEY, and CARYN
PRASSE, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF CLASS
13 v. CERTIFICATION
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR
COMPANY, INC., and
HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, LTD.
16 Defendants.
INTRODUCTION In this product-defect class action, plaintiffs and defendants independently move for reconsideration of an order on class certification. To the extent stated below, the motions for reconsideration are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. STATEMENT A previous order detailed the facts of this case (Dkt. No. 127). This action concerns vehicle owners who purchased certain Honda vehicles equipped with Variable Timing Control (VTC) actuator 14310-R44-A01 from authorized Honda dealers and now seek to recover for an alleged design…