Gomez

Gomez v. Buresh

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20224:21-cv-08138California178 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANDRES GOMEZ, Case No. 21-cv-08138-KAW Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH

? v. PREJUDICE DONALD FRANK BURESH, Re: Dkt. No. 19 Defendant.

On March 23, 2022, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing. || (Dismissal Order, Dkt. No. 18.) The Court gave Plaintiff 21 days to file an amended complaint or a notice of intent not to file an amended complaint. (Ud. at 6.) On April 13, 2022, Plaintiff || notified the Court that he would not file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 19.) Accordingly, the |} Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs claims with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and will enter judgment in favor of Defendants and close the case. See Edwards v. Marin || Park, Inc., 356 F.3d 1058, 1064-65 (9th Cir. 2004). IT IS SO ORDERED. || Dated: April 27, 2022 .

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.