Hill

Hill v. Cornelson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20224:21-cv-06616California406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CYMEYON V. HILL,

Case No. 21-cv-06616-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT v. PREJUDICE 7 SOCIAL WORKER CORNELSON, et al., 8 Defendants.

On February 3, 2022, the Court issued a Second Dismissal with Leave to Amend. Specifically, the Court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days from the date of the Order to file a second amended complaint to allege facts sufficient to state a cognizable constitutional claim. Plaintiff was warned that the failure to timely file an amended complaint would result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. The time for plaintiff to file his second amended complaint has passed, and no second amended complaint has been filed. Taking into account the salient factors set forth in Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992), the Court finds that dismissal is warranted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 1 See Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier, 191 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.