King

King v. Macay

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20223:21-cv-08309California4,678 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RASHAD LAMAR KING,

Case No. 21-cv-08309-DMR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE v.

E. MACAY, et al.,

10 Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at Centinela State Prison, has filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleges a violation of his constitutional rights by prison officials at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), where he was previously incarcerated. In his complaint, Plaintiff names the following SVSP prison officials in both their individual and official capacities: Correctional Sergeants C. Tange and E. Macay; Chief Deputy Warden E. Borla; Warden M. Atchley; and Associate Warden John Doe #1. Dkt. 1 at 2, 9. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief as well as monetary and punitive damages. Id. at 13-14. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Dkt. 6. Therefore, this matter has been assigned to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.