Gomez
Gomez v. Reynolds Creative Products, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANDRES GOMEZ, Case No. 22-cv-00830-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
REYNOLDS CREATIVE PRODUCTS,
INC.,
11 Defendant.
12 On February 9, 2022, Plaintiff Andres Gomez filed this action against Defendant Reynolds Creative Products, Inc., alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”) in relation to the Reynolds Family Winery website, with a root domain of https://www.reynoldsfamilywinery.com/. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under the ADA, statutory damages under the Unruh Act, and attorney’s fees and costs. Id. at 9. Plaintiff contends that this Court has federal question jurisdiction over the ADA claim and supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims. Id. ¶¶ 7-8. Supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right.” United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726 (1966). District courts have discretion to…