Johnson v. DL Vua Kho Bo & O Mai Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20224:22-cv-00648California1,014 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 22-cv-00648-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

DL VUA KHO BO & O MAI INC., Defendant.

12 On January 31, 2022, Plaintiff Scott Johnson filed this action against Defendant DL Vua Kho Bo & O Mai Inc., alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”) in relation to the Vua Kho Bo & O Mai store located in San Jose, California. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief under the ADA and the Unruh Act, statutory damages under the Unruh Act, and attorney’s fees and costs. Id. at 7. Plaintiff contends that this Court has federal question jurisdiction over the ADA claim and supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims. Id. ¶¶ 5-6. Supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right.” United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726 (1966). District courts have discretion to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.