Dick
Dick v. Corman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WESLEY DICK, Case No. 21-cv-07169-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR ENTRY OF
v. DEFAULT
D. SCOTT CORMAN, Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant.
12 Since Plaintiff filed suit on September 16, 2021, (Dkt. No. 1), Defendant has not answered or otherwise defended himself in this case. On February 28, 2022, Plaintiff moved for entry of default against Defendant. (Dkt. No. 17.) The Clerk of Court denied the motion on the grounds that service of the summons via email did not meet the requirements of California Code of Civil Procedure § 415.10, and the Court had not authorized alternative service. (Dkt. No. 18.) Plaintiff now moves the Court to direct the Clerk to enter default. (Dkt. No. 21.) Plaintiff served the motion on Defendant by email, (Dkt. No. 23), and Defendant has not filed a response. BACKGROUND On November 8, 2021, Plaintiff’s counsel emailed Defendant the summons, complaint and 22…