K.W.
K.W. v. Epic Games, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 K.W., et al., Case No. 21-cv-00976-CRB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO DISMISS
EPIC GAMES, INC., Defendant. The Court GRANTS Defendant Epic Games, Inc.’s unopposed motion to dismiss 14 || this action. Mot. (dkt. 52). To determine whether Plaintiffs’ claims are precluded by a || state court judgment, the Court looks to the claim preclusion rules of the relevant state. || See Hesse v. Sprint Corp., 595 F.3d 581, 587 (9th Cir. 2010). Plaintiffs participated in a 17 || nationwide class settlement with Epic Games in North Carolina state court. See Zanca v. 18 |} Epic Games, Inc., No. 21-CVS-534 (N.C. Super. Ct., Wake County). The settlement is 19 || final, and all appeals have been withdrawn. See Jacobson Decl. (dkt. 52-1) 92 & Ex. A. 20 || All parties agree that, under North Carolina law, the Settlement Agreement releases the || claims Plaintiffs raised in this case. …