Gomez

Gomez v. Corro

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20223:21-cv-07085California1,625 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANDRES GOMEZ, Case No. 21-cv-07085-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING ADA CLAIM

v. WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND AND

DISMISSING UNRUH ACT CLAIM

PAULO CORRO, et al., WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants.

12 On September 13, 2021, plaintiff Andres Gomez filed this lawsuit against real estate agents Paulo Corro and Arturo Ramirez, d/b/a Corro Ramiriz. Mr. Gomez is visually impaired and he lives in Miami, Florida. This case is one of a spate filed by Mr. Gomez in the Northern District of California against Napa Valley real estate companies. In each case, Gomez alleges that the defendants’ websites are inaccessible to people with visual disabilities, and that as a result he was unable to navigate the websites to obtain information about houses for sale in Northern California. Gomez’s lawsuits allege claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and California’s Unruh Civil Rights…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.