Gomez

Gomez v. Huneeus Wines LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20224:22-cv-02528California1,025 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANDRES GOMEZ, Case No. 22-cv-02528-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

HUNEEUS WINES LLC, Defendant.

12 On April 26, 2022, Plaintiff Andres Gomez filed this action against Defendant Huneeus Wines LLC, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”) in relation to the Flowers Vineyards & Winery website with a root domain of https://www.flowerswinery.com/. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under the ADA, statutory damages under the Unruh Act, and attorney’s fees and costs. Id. at 9. Plaintiff contends that this Court has federal question jurisdiction over the ADA claim and supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims. Id. ¶¶ 7-8. Supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right.” United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726 (1966). District courts have discretion to decline to exercise supplemental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.