Sahinturk
Facebook, Inc. v. Sahinturk
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FACEBOOK, INC., et al., Case No. 20-cv-08153-JSC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR DEFAULT
v. JUDGMENT
ENSAR SAHINTURK, Re: Dkt. No. 29 Defendant.
12 Facebook, Inc. and Instagram, LLC (“Plaintiffs”), filed suit against Ensar Sahinturk, alleging cybersquatting and trademark dilution in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1125(c) and (d), and state law claims of breach of contract and unjust enrichment. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment seeking damages, permanent injunctive relief, and attorneys’ fees and costs. (Dkt. No. 29.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion. BACKGROUND I. Complaint Allegations Plaintiffs are Delaware corporations with their principal places of business in Menlo Park, California. (Dkt. No. 1 ¶¶ 3-4.) Instagram is a subsidiary of Facebook. (Id. ¶ 4.) Mr. Sahinturk is an individual…