Copley

Copley v. Natera, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20224:21-cv-08941California376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 ELIZABETH COPLEY, Case No. 4:21-cv-08941-YGR

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CAFA v.

JURISDICTION

Dkt. No. 28 NATERA, INC., Defendant.

TO PLAINTIFF ELIZABETH COPLEY AND HER COUNSEL OF RECORD: YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING no later than May 18, 2022, why plaintiff’s claims should not be dismissed for failing to establish that jurisdiction is proper pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). Pursuant to CAFA, this Court has original jurisdiction over class actions in which there are at least 100 class members, at least one of which is diverse in citizenship from any defendant, and for which the aggregate amount in controversy exceeds the sum of $5 million, exclusive of interest and costs. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2); Ibarra v. Manheim Invs., Inc., 775 F. 3d 1193, 1196-97 (9th Cir. 2015). The party asserting that jurisdiction is proper bears the burden of establishing federal jurisdiction. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.