Briskin

Briskin v. Shopify Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20224:21-cv-06269California2,830 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRANDON BRISKIN, Case No. 21-cv-06269-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL

SHOPIFY INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 51, 52, 53 Defendants.

13 The three motions of defendants Shopify Inc., Shopify (USA) Inc., and Shopify Payments (USA) Inc. to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) all came on for hearing before this court on April 28, 2022. Plaintiff appeared through his counsel, Kali Backer. Defendants appeared through their counsel, Aravind Swaminathan and Thomas Fu. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND This putative class action for invasion of privacy concerns the collection of consumer data over an online shopping platform. Plaintiff Brandon Briskin is an Internet shopper and resident of Madera, California. SAC ¶…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.