Lee v. Bank of America, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20223:21-cv-07231California768 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HOWARD LEE, Case No. 21-cv-07231-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Howard Lee, who is representing himself, brings claims against Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and Bank of America Corporation for negligence, fraud, and contract-related breaches. On February 28, 2022, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by March 30, 2022. (Dkt. No. 26.) Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint and did not otherwise respond to the Court’s Order. On April 11, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Dkt. No. 27.) Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s Order and the deadline to do so has passed. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the Court may dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or to comply with a court order. See Hells Canyon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.