Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CYNTEC COMPANY, LTD., Case No. 18-cv-00939-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER RE POST-TRIAL MOTIONS
CHILISIN ELECTRONICS CORP., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 285, 286, 288, 294 Defendants.
12 13 Before the court are the post-trial motions filed by the parties in the above- captioned case. Defendants Chilisin Electronics Corp. and Chilisin America Ltd. (collectively “Chilisin”) filed a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b) (Dkt. 285) and a motion for a new trial under Rule 59 (Dkt. 286). Plaintiff Cyntec Company Ltd. (“Cyntec”) filed a motion for permanent injunction and enhanced damages (Dkt. 288). Chilisin also filed a motion to seal in connection with its opposition to Cyntec’s motion for permanent injunction and enhanced damages (Dkt. 294). The matters are fully briefed and suitable for resolution without oral argument. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant…