Morris

Morris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20223:21-cv-06270California652 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LILIAN MORRIS,

Case No. 21-cv-06270-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

13 Defendant.

15 Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) brings a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). For the reasons explained below, the motion is granted. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), this matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument and the hearing scheduled for May 26, 2022 is vacated. On June 29, 2019, Plaintiff Lillian Morris filed this lawsuit against Wells Fargo, erroneously sued as Wells Fargo Mortgage, in Contra Costa Superior Court. On August 13, 2021, Wells Fargo timely removed this action to federal court. Wells Fargo moved to dismiss Morris’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or in the alternative, for a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e). On October 14, 2021 this Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.