Muto

Muto v. County of Mendocino

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20223:20-cv-06232California8,151 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 MARY MUTO, Case No. 20-cv-06232-SK

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, Regarding Docket Nos. 38, 38-14; 56 Defendant.

Defendant County of Mendocino (“Defendant”) moves for summary judgment in this matter. (Dkt. Nos. 38, 56.) Having considered the submissions of the parties, the record in the case, and the relevant legal authorities, and having had the benefit of oral argument, the Court HEREBY GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, for the reasons set forth below. The Court further GRANTS Defendant’s request for judicial notice. (Dkt. No. 38-14.) The Court OVERRULES objections by Plaintiff Mary Muto (“Plaintiff”) to Defendant’s evidence (Dkt. No. 43 at page 13) and OVERULES Defendant’s objections to Plaintiff’s evidence (Dkt. No.47 at 8, 14). BACKGROUND Starting in February 2015, Plaintiff was employed by Defendant as a Social…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.