Montera

Montera v. Premier Nutrition Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20223:16-cv-06980California2,983 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARY BETH MONTERA,

Case No. 16-cv-06980-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE

PREMIER NUTRITION CORPORATION,

13 Defendant.

15 I. Introduction In this consumer class action alleging violations of New York false advertising law, Lead Plaintiff Mary Beth Montera and Defendant Premier Nutrition Corporation (“Premier”) bring motions in limine in advance of the May 23, 2022 trial. The motions are granted and denied as described as below. This order is filed concurrently with the order addressing Premier’s motion to exclude witnesses who were not timely disclosed. II. Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine 1. Motion to Exclude Evidence and Argument Regarding FDA Drug or Supplement Standards Premier has stipulated it will not introduce evidence pertaining to “(1) evidence or argument that Plaintiff or her experts are attempting to enforce an FDA standard for drugs on Joint …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.