SALOOJAS, INC. v. Aetna Health of California, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SALOOJAS, INC., Case Nos. 22-cv-01696-JSC Plaintiff, 22-cv-01702-JSC 8 22-cv-01703-JSC

22-cv-01704-JSC v. 22-cv-01706-JSC

AETNA HEALTH OF CALIFORNIA,

INC., ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING Defendant.

14 Pending before the Court are Defendant’s identical motions to dismiss each of these five related cases. (Case No. 22-cv-01696-JSC, Dkt. Nos. 5, 7; Case No. 22-cv-01702-JSC, Dkt. No. 7; Case No. 22-cv-01703-JSC, Dkt. No. 5; Case No. 22-cv-01704-JSC, Dkt. No. 6; Case No. 22- cv-01706-JSC, Dkt. No. 7.)1 To determine whether a statute implies a private right of action, one relevant consideration is the administrative enforcement scheme, if any, that the statute explicitly provides. See Alexander v. Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275, 289–91 (2001); Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 78 (1975) (“Second, is…