Dali Wireless, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20223:20-cv-06469California4,237 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DALI WIRELESS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-06469-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Docket No. 124 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Dali Wireless, Inc. (“Dali”) filed this lawsuit against Defendant Corning Optical Communications LLC (“Corning”) for patent infringement. There are three patents at issue: the ‘261 patent, the ‘358 patent, and the ‘454 patent. The Court GRANTS Corning’s motion for judgment on the pleadings for reasons stated below. II. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Dali initiated this lawsuit against Corning on December 30, 2019. In its original complaint, it asserted infringement of two different patents – i.e., the ‘074 and ‘766 patents. See Docket No. 1 (Complaint). In its first amended complaint (“FAC”) filed on April 30, 2020, Dali asserted infringement of three new…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.