Sherman

Sherman v. The Regents of University of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20225:20-cv-06441California5,119 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 BENJAMIN SHERMAN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06441-VKD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v. 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, THE REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA, 67, 81,

12 Defendant.

13 The Court held a pretrial conference in this matter on May 6, 2022. Dkt. No. 115. This order resolves the parties’ motions in limine. Dkt. Nos. 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 81, 82. I. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE A. Motion in Limine No. 1 (Evidence of Dispute with Adel Atta) Plaintiffs move for an order excluding any evidence or argument regarding (1) Mr. Hammoudeh’s grade dispute arising from a class he took in the spring of 2014 at San Jose State University taught by a Lecturer named Adel Atta, (2) Professor Atta’s alleged retaliatory allegations against Mr. Hammoudeh, including a police report and claims of harassment, and (3) social media posts by Mr. Hammoudeh or others…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.