Greenpeace, Inc. v. Walmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20223:21-cv-00754California716 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GREENPEACE, INC., Case No. 21-cv-00754-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT; AFFORDING

PLAINTIFF FURTHER LEAVE TO

WALMART INC., AMEND; VACATING HEARING;

CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT

Defendant. CONFERENCE

Before the Court is defendant Walmart Inc.'s Motion, filed March 25, 2022, "to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint." Plaintiff Greenpeace, Inc. has filed opposition, to which defendant has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for determination on the parties' respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for May 13, 2022, and rules as follows. 1. Contrary to defendant's argument, there is no bar to a private party basing a claim under § 17200 of the Business & Professions Code on a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.