UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CECILIA VALDOVINOS, Case No. 21-cv-01924-JCS
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 42 CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD U.S., INC., et al., 11 Defendants.
I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Cushman & Wakefield U.S., Inc. (“C&W”) and Kevin O’Hair move for summary judgment on Plaintiff Cecilia Valdovinos’s claims in this employment discrimination case. The Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the motion hearing previously set for May 13, 2022. The case management conference set for the same time remains on calendar. For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion is DENIED.1 II. BACKGROUND A. Evidentiary Record Because the Court views the evidence in the light most favorable to Valdovinos for the purpose of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, this factual summary is presented generally in that light. It is not intended as a complete recitation of the evidentiary record…