Felix
Felix v. Symantec Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SEB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AB, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. C 18-02902 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER RE MOTIONS TO SEAL
SYMANTEC CORPORATION and
GREGORY S. CLARK,
15 Defendants. 16 Two motions to seal remain pending in this case. In the first, the parties seek to file a supplemental agreement to the class settlement under seal (Dkt. No. 403). In the second, class counsel seek to redact descriptions of their billing records filed in connection with their motion for attorney’s fees (Dkt. No. 412). For the reasons that follow, the motions are DENIED. The public has “a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). “This right is justified by the interests of citizens in keeping a watchful eye on the workings of public agencies.” Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)…