Felix

Felix v. Symantec Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20223:18-cv-02902California801 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AB, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. C 18-02902 WHA

Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER RE MOTIONS TO SEAL

SYMANTEC CORPORATION and

GREGORY S. CLARK,

15 Defendants. 16 Two motions to seal remain pending in this case. In the first, the parties seek to file a supplemental agreement to the class settlement under seal (Dkt. No. 403). In the second, class counsel seek to redact descriptions of their billing records filed in connection with their motion for attorney’s fees (Dkt. No. 412). For the reasons that follow, the motions are DENIED. The public has “a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). “This right is justified by the interests of citizens in keeping a watchful eye on the workings of public agencies.” Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.